Reference Source

Dam safety hazard classification, inspection frequency, and owner obligations by US state

State-by-state comparison of dam safety programs: hazard classification systems, inspection frequencies, who must inspect, and dam owner obligations. Each record is one (state, hazard class) pair with the classification name, criteria for that class, required inspection interval, inspector qualifications, and whether inspections are mandatory or voluntary. Covers the ~91,000 non-federal dams in the US. Answers 'how often must my dam be inspected in [state]', 'what hazard classification is my dam', 'do I need a licensed engineer for inspections in [state]', and 'what are the penalties for non-compliance'. The ASDSO published a 50-state summary in 2020 as a PDF; it is now 6 years stale and not structured for search. This asset maintains the current state of each program from each state's own dam safety statute and program pages.

Records11
Sources3
Verified
Review by
LicenceUS state government works — public domain

The data

StateHazard classificationClassification criteriaInspection frequencyMandatoryInspector qualificationStatute
CaliforniaExtremely HighExpected to cause considerable loss of human life or would result in an inundation area with a population of 1,000 or more.annuallyyesDivision of Safety of Dams (DSOD)California Water Code
CaliforniaHighExpected to cause loss of at least one human life.annuallyyesDivision of Safety of Dams (DSOD)California Water Code
MichiganHighEmergency Action Plans (EAPs) are required for high and significant hazard damsevery 3 yearsyesprofessional engineer licensed in MichiganPart 315, Dam Safety, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451
VermontHighProbable or Certain (one or more) (extensive downstream residential, commercial, or industrial development)2 yearsnoDam Safety Program or an engineer hired by the Owner10 V.S.A. § 1105
CaliforniaLowNo probable loss of human life and low economic and environmental losses. Losses are expected to be principally limited to the owner's property.annuallyyesDivision of Safety of Dams (DSOD)California Water Code
MichiganLowDams that are over six feet in height and impound five acres or moreevery 5 yearsyesprofessional engineer licensed in MichiganPart 315, Dam Safety, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451
VermontLowNone Expected loss of life; Private agricultural lands, equipment and isolated non-occupied buildings, non-major roads; No disruption of services – repairs are cosmetic or rapidly repairable damage; Minimal incremental damage10 yearsnoDam Safety Program or an engineer hired by the Owner10 V.S.A. § 1105
VermontMinimalSame as LOW hazard; None property losses10 yearsnoDam Safety Program or an engineer hired by the Owner10 V.S.A. § 1105
CaliforniaSignificantNo probable loss of human life but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, impacts to critical facilities, or other significant impacts.annuallyyesDivision of Safety of Dams (DSOD)California Water Code
MichiganSignificantEmergency Action Plans (EAPs) are required for high and significant hazard damsevery 4 yearsyesprofessional engineer licensed in MichiganPart 315, Dam Safety, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451
VermontSignificantNone expected loss of life; Major or extensive public and private facilities property losses; Disruption of essential or critical facilities and access; Major or extensive mitigation required or impossible to mitigate5 yearsnoDam Safety Program or an engineer hired by the Owner10 V.S.A. § 1105

Where this came from

Every record above links the page it was taken from and quotes the sentence that states it. These are the 3 sources this dataset was assembled from.

Machine-readable

11 records. last verified against source . due for re-check by .

Licence. US state government works — public domain