Reference Source · MCP server health

jp.addresstozip/address-to-zip

日本の住所⇄郵便番号を変換。表記ゆれも吸収。Japan address ⇄ postal code, handles messy input. Free tier, no API key.

One endpoint on the official MCP registry. Probed daily.

https://addresstozip.jp/mcp

no usable response (DNS, TLS, timeout or 5xx)

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthy2026-10-21
Completed sessions71.4% of the last 7 probes · 93.1% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 489 ms, 95th 1675 ms
Tools listed—
Tool contract3ad1e62f2506 — unchanged over the 21 days we have read it
Protocol answered—
Transportstreamable-http
Last detail[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Hostname mismatch, certificate is not valid for 'addresstozi

Embed the badge

[![MCP](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/badge/jp-addresstozip-address-to-zip.svg)](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/server/jp-addresstozip-address-to-zip/)

The badge shows the most recent probe. It is generated from the same file this page is, updates once a day, and needs no key.

What was actually measured

One HTTP POST carrying a JSON-RPC initialize, and if that succeeds, a tools/list. Nothing here is a score, a rating or a judgement about whether the server is any good — only whether an ordinary MCP client could complete a session with it on the day we asked. “Needs credentials” is not a fault: it means the endpoint wants an account, which is a perfectly reasonable thing for it to want.

The tool contract row is a digest of what tools/list returned — each tool's name, description and input schema, hashed — so that a rename, a newly-required field or a rewritten description can be spotted even though none of them breaks the connection. We keep the digests and nothing else: no tool name, description or schema of anybody's is stored or republished here, which is also why this can say that a contract moved and by how much, but not what it now says.

The method and the daily totals · every server we probe, A–Z · feed.json · licence · corrections and removals: [email protected]