Reference Source · MCP server health

io.github.Un3x/ai-success-story

First-person AI war-stories from coding sessions, searchable via MCP for prior-art consultation.

One endpoint on the official MCP registry. Probed daily.

https://ai-success-story-20f19ed7769b.herokuapp.com/mcp

answers HTTP, not MCP

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthynot once, in the days we have probed
Completed sessions0% of the last 7 probes · 0% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 89 ms, 95th 462 ms
Tools listed—
Protocol answered—
Transportstreamable-http
Last detailHTTP 404

Embed the badge

[![MCP](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/badge/io-github-un3x-ai-success-story.svg)](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/server/io-github-un3x-ai-success-story/)

The badge shows the most recent probe. It is generated from the same file this page is, updates once a day, and needs no key.

What was actually measured

One HTTP POST carrying a JSON-RPC initialize, and if that succeeds, a tools/list. Nothing here is a score, a rating or a judgement about whether the server is any good — only whether an ordinary MCP client could complete a session with it on the day we asked. “Needs credentials” is not a fault: it means the endpoint wants an account, which is a perfectly reasonable thing for it to want.

The tool contract row is a digest of what tools/list returned — each tool's name, description and input schema, hashed — so that a rename, a newly-required field or a rewritten description can be spotted even though none of them breaks the connection. We keep the digests and nothing else: no tool name, description or schema of anybody's is stored or republished here, which is also why this can say that a contract moved and by how much, but not what it now says.

The method and the daily totals · every server we probe, A–Z · feed.json · licence · corrections and removals: [email protected]