Reference Source · MCP server health

io.github.adriancasas/geo360-concierge

Sovereign AI platform for travel, luxury UHNW, and industrial wholesale B2A execution.

2 endpoints on the official MCP registry. Probed daily.

https://geo360.apolloproject.cloud/mcp

answered, tools listed

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthy2026-10-23
Completed sessions100% of the last 7 probes · 100% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 382 ms, 95th 523 ms
Tools listed37
Tool contract341b63ef8043 — last moved 2026-10-18 (34 added, 1 changed in place, against 2026-10-17), and on 2 of the days probed
Protocol answered2024-11-05
Transportstreamable-http

https://geo360.apolloproject.cloud/v1/geo360/mcp/sse

answered, tools listed

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthy2026-10-23
Completed sessions85.7% of the last 7 probes · 88.9% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 332 ms, 95th 2085 ms
Tools listed37
Tool contract341b63ef8043 — last moved 2026-10-18 (34 added, 1 changed in place, against 2026-10-17), and on 2 of the days probed
Protocol answered2024-11-05
Transportsse

Embed the badge

[![MCP](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/badge/io-github-adriancasas-geo360-concierge.svg)](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/server/io-github-adriancasas-geo360-concierge/)

The badge shows the most recent probe. It is generated from the same file this page is, updates once a day, and needs no key. This entry publishes 2 endpoints, and the badge reports the best result among them — the question a badge answers is whether a client can reach this project at all, and one dead spare URL is not a reason to call the project down. The per-endpoint verdicts are above, each with its own link.

What was actually measured

One HTTP POST carrying a JSON-RPC initialize, and if that succeeds, a tools/list. Nothing here is a score, a rating or a judgement about whether the server is any good — only whether an ordinary MCP client could complete a session with it on the day we asked. “Needs credentials” is not a fault: it means the endpoint wants an account, which is a perfectly reasonable thing for it to want.

The tool contract row is a digest of what tools/list returned — each tool's name, description and input schema, hashed — so that a rename, a newly-required field or a rewritten description can be spotted even though none of them breaks the connection. We keep the digests and nothing else: no tool name, description or schema of anybody's is stored or republished here, which is also why this can say that a contract moved and by how much, but not what it now says.

The method and the daily totals · every server we probe, A–Z · feed.json · licence · corrections and removals: [email protected]