Reference Source · MCP server health

dev.workers.cybermax-tools.cybermax/recallroll-api

2 endpoints on the official MCP registry. Probed daily.

https://recallroll-api.cybermax-tools.workers.dev/mcp?via=mcp-registry

answered, tools listed

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthy2026-10-10
Completed sessions— of the last 7 probes · 100% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 130 ms, 95th 376 ms
Tools listed2
Tool contractbd483401c50c — unchanged over the 10 days we have read it
Protocol answered2025-06-18
Transportstreamable-http

https://recallroll-api.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry

answered, tools listed

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthy2026-10-23
Completed sessions100% of the last 7 probes · 100% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 129 ms, 95th 175 ms
Tools listed2
Tool contract842a6b6b8696 — last moved 2026-10-11 (2 changed in place, against 2026-10-10)
Protocol answered2025-06-18
Transportstreamable-http

Embed the badge

[![MCP](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/badge/dev-workers-cybermax-tools-cybermax-recallroll-api.svg)](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/server/dev-workers-cybermax-tools-cybermax-recallroll-api/)

The badge shows the most recent probe. It is generated from the same file this page is, updates once a day, and needs no key. This entry publishes 2 endpoints, and the badge reports the best result among them — the question a badge answers is whether a client can reach this project at all, and one dead spare URL is not a reason to call the project down. The per-endpoint verdicts are above, each with its own link.

What was actually measured

One HTTP POST carrying a JSON-RPC initialize, and if that succeeds, a tools/list. Nothing here is a score, a rating or a judgement about whether the server is any good — only whether an ordinary MCP client could complete a session with it on the day we asked. “Needs credentials” is not a fault: it means the endpoint wants an account, which is a perfectly reasonable thing for it to want.

The tool contract row is a digest of what tools/list returned — each tool's name, description and input schema, hashed — so that a rename, a newly-required field or a rewritten description can be spotted even though none of them breaks the connection. We keep the digests and nothing else: no tool name, description or schema of anybody's is stored or republished here, which is also why this can say that a contract moved and by how much, but not what it now says.

The method and the daily totals · every server we probe, A–Z · feed.json · licence · corrections and removals: [email protected]