Reference Source · MCP server health

co.dealwize/dealwize

Analyse B2B sales deals, uncover risks, stakeholders, next steps, and winning actions.

2 endpoints on the official MCP registry. Probed daily.

https://api.dealwize.co/api/v1/mcp

no usable response (DNS, TLS, timeout or 5xx)

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthy2026-10-11
Completed sessions0% of the last 7 probes · 60% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 194 ms, 95th 347 ms
Tools listed—
Tool contract9ce8305976ae — unchanged over the 12 days we have read it
Protocol answered—
Transportstreamable-http
Last detail[Errno 8] nodename nor servname provided, or not known

https://api.dealwize.co/api/v1/mcp/sse

no usable response (DNS, TLS, timeout or 5xx)

Last 30 probes
Last seen healthynot once, in the days we have probed
Completed sessions0% of the last 7 probes · 0% of the last 30
Handshake latencymedian 143 ms, 95th 440 ms
Tools listed—
Protocol answered—
Transportsse
Last detail[Errno 8] nodename nor servname provided, or not known

Embed the badge

[![MCP](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/badge/co-dealwize-dealwize.svg)](https://referencesource.org/mcp-health/server/co-dealwize-dealwize/)

The badge shows the most recent probe. It is generated from the same file this page is, updates once a day, and needs no key. This entry publishes 2 endpoints, and the badge reports the best result among them — the question a badge answers is whether a client can reach this project at all, and one dead spare URL is not a reason to call the project down. The per-endpoint verdicts are above, each with its own link.

What was actually measured

One HTTP POST carrying a JSON-RPC initialize, and if that succeeds, a tools/list. Nothing here is a score, a rating or a judgement about whether the server is any good — only whether an ordinary MCP client could complete a session with it on the day we asked. “Needs credentials” is not a fault: it means the endpoint wants an account, which is a perfectly reasonable thing for it to want.

The tool contract row is a digest of what tools/list returned — each tool's name, description and input schema, hashed — so that a rename, a newly-required field or a rewritten description can be spotted even though none of them breaks the connection. We keep the digests and nothing else: no tool name, description or schema of anybody's is stored or republished here, which is also why this can say that a contract moved and by how much, but not what it now says.

The method and the daily totals · every server we probe, A–Z · feed.json · licence · corrections and removals: [email protected]