{"asset": "litigation-funding-disclosure-requirements-by-state", "asset_type": "jurisdictional-variation", "body": "When an outside investor pays a plaintiff's litigation costs in exchange for a cut of any recovery, most states say nothing about whether the other side, or the court, ever gets to know the funder exists or what it can control \u2014 discovery of the agreement is fought case by case. A small but fast-growing minority now write disclosure into a statute instead: Wisconsin (2018, the first), Indiana (2023), Montana (2023), West Virginia (a 2024 amendment) and Kansas (a 2025 amendment) each require a party who has taken litigation funding to say so without waiting for a discovery request \u2014 and Wisconsin, West Virginia and Montana do it in nearly identical statutory language, evidence the wording is being copied state to state as the idea spreads. What has to be handed over differs: Wisconsin, West Virginia and Montana require the agreement itself, Kansas requires the agreement to the court in camera plus a six-item sworn statement to the other parties, and Indiana requires only written notice that a funding contract exists. At least six more states legislated on litigation funding in 2025\u20132026 (Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New York), a Michigan bill passed its House in May 2026, and a federal Litigation Funding Transparency Act (S. 3826, 119th Congress) sits in Senate Judiciary Committee \u2014 this is actively moving ground, not settled law. No comprehensive, current, citation-backed free tracker exists: the one law-firm '50-state guide' found (Lewis Brisbois) is a JS-gated page with no readable body; the one maintained comparison site found (CaseGlide, checked 2026-09-02) cites zero statute sections anywhere, and is flatly wrong about West Virginia \u2014 it says West Virginia only 'regulates funder conduct rather than compelling disclosure,' when W. Va. Code \u00a746A-6N-6 requires exactly the same automatic disclosure to other parties that Wisconsin's statute does. This asset states, per state, the clause that creates that obligation \u2014 who must disclose, to whom, and when \u2014 quoted verbatim from the state's own official legislature host \u2014 its online code where that is readable, and its enrolled act where the code viewer serves no text, as is the case for Indiana. It covers only the obligation to disclose inside a lawsuit: statutes that instead regulate what a funder must put in its contract with the consumer who borrows (West Virginia \u00a746A-6N-5, Arizona's SB 1215, and reportedly Georgia's and New York's 2025 acts) are a different mechanism and are deliberately out of scope, noted in the source list rather than folded in. Answers 'does my state require disclosure of litigation funding', 'do I have to tell the other side I have a litigation funder', 'is third-party litigation funding regulated in my state'.\n", "description": "When an outside investor pays a plaintiff's litigation costs in exchange for a cut of any recovery, most states say nothing about whether the other side, or the court, ever gets to know the funder exists or what it can control \u2014 discovery of the agreement is fought case by case. A small but fast-growing minority now write disclosure into a statute instead: Wisconsin (2018, the first), Indiana (2023), Montana (2023), West Virginia (a 2024 amendment) and Kansas (a 2025 amendment) each require a party who has taken litigation funding to say so without waiting for a discovery request \u2014 and Wisconsin, West Virginia and Montana do it in nearly identical statutory language, evidence the wording is being copied state to state as the idea spreads. What has to be handed over differs: Wisconsin, West Virginia and Montana require the agreement itself, Kansas requires the agreement to the court in camera plus a six-item sworn statement to the other parties, and Indiana requires only written notice that a funding contract exists. At least six more states legislated on litigation funding in 2025\u20132026 (Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New York), a Michigan bill passed its House in May 2026, and a federal Litigation Funding Transparency Act (S. 3826, 119th Congress) sits in Senate Judiciary Committee \u2014 this is actively moving ground, not settled law. No comprehensive, current, citation-backed free tracker exists: the one law-firm '50-state guide' found (Lewis Brisbois) is a JS-gated page with no readable body; the one maintained comparison site found (CaseGlide, checked 2026-09-02) cites zero statute sections anywhere, and is flatly wrong about West Virginia \u2014 it says West Virginia only 'regulates funder conduct rather than compelling disclosure,' when W. Va. Code \u00a746A-6N-6 requires exactly the same automatic disclosure to other parties that Wisconsin's statute does. This asset states, per state, the clause that creates that obligation \u2014 who must disclose, to whom, and when \u2014 quoted verbatim from the state's own official legislature host \u2014 its online code where that is readable, and its enrolled act where the code viewer serves no text, as is the case for Indiana. It covers only the obligation to disclose inside a lawsuit: statutes that instead regulate what a funder must put in its contract with the consumer who borrows (West Virginia \u00a746A-6N-5, Arizona's SB 1215, and reportedly Georgia's and New York's 2025 acts) are a different mechanism and are deliberately out of scope, noted in the source list rather than folded in. Answers 'does my state require disclosure of litigation funding', 'do I have to tell the other side I have a litigation funder', 'is third-party litigation funding regulated in my state'.", "file": "index.md", "generated": true, "harvested": "2026-09-02", "key_field": "jurisdiction", "licence": "unknown", "sources": ["https://iga.in.gov/pdf-documents/123/2023/house/bills/HB1124/HB1124.05.ENRS.pdf", "https://www.ksrevisor.gov/statutes/chapters/ch60/060_002_0026.html", "https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0310/chapter_0040/part_0010/section_0080/0310-0040-0010-0080.html", "https://code.wvlegislature.gov/46A-6N-6/", "https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/804.01(2)(bg)"], "stale_after": "2027-03-01", "title": "Third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements by US state \u2014 whether the law requires a party to disclose a litigation funding agreement, to whom, and on what trigger, quoted from the statute itself", "type": "dataset", "verified": false}
{"asset": "litigation-funding-disclosure-requirements-by-state", "body": "**State:** Indiana\n\n**Disclosure obligation:** Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsection (c), in a civil proceeding in which a consumer claimant is a party, the consumer claimant or the consumer claimant's attorney shall provide to: (1) each of the other parties in the civil proceeding; and (2) each insurer that has a duty to defend another party in the civil proceeding; written notice that the consumer claimant has entered into a CPAP contract with a CPAP provider.\n\n**Disclosed to:** each of the other parties in the civil proceeding, and each insurer that has a duty to defend another party in that proceeding\n\n**When:** within a reasonable time after the date on which the consumer claimant and the CPAP provider enter into the CPAP contract\n\n**Statute:** IC 24-12-4-2\n\n> SECTION 1. IC 24-12-4-2 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW SECTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023]: Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsection (c), in a civil proceeding in which a consumer claimant is a party, the consumer claimant or the consumer claimant's attorney shall provide to: (1) each of the other parties in the civil proceeding; and (2) each insurer that has a duty to defend another party in the civil proceeding; written notice that the consumer claimant has entered into a CPAP contract with a CPAP provider. (b) A consumer claimant or the consumer claimant's attorney shall provide the written notice required by subsection (a) within a reasonable time after the date on which the consumer claimant and the CPAP provider enter into the CPAP contract, regardless of whether any other party in the civil proceeding is aware of the existence of or seeks information about the CPAP contract.\n\nSource: <https://iga.in.gov/pdf-documents/123/2023/house/bills/HB1124/HB1124.05.ENRS.pdf>\n", "disclosure_requirement": "Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsection (c), in a civil proceeding in which a consumer claimant is a party, the consumer claimant or the consumer claimant's attorney shall provide to: (1) each of the other parties in the civil proceeding; and (2) each insurer that has a duty to defend another party in the civil proceeding; written notice that the consumer claimant has entered into a CPAP contract with a CPAP provider.", "disclosure_timing": "within a reasonable time after the date on which the consumer claimant and the CPAP provider enter into the CPAP contract", "file": "indiana.md", "generated": true, "harvested": "2026-09-02", "id": "indiana", "jurisdiction": "Indiana", "recipients": "each of the other parties in the civil proceeding, and each insurer that has a duty to defend another party in that proceeding", "source_quote": "SECTION 1. IC 24-12-4-2 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW SECTION TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023]: Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in subsection (c), in a civil proceeding in which a consumer claimant is a party, the consumer claimant or the consumer claimant's attorney shall provide to: (1) each of the other parties in the civil proceeding; and (2) each insurer that has a duty to defend another party in the civil proceeding; written notice that the consumer claimant has entered into a CPAP contract with a CPAP provider. (b) A consumer claimant or the consumer claimant's attorney shall provide the written notice required by subsection (a) within a reasonable time after the date on which the consumer claimant and the CPAP provider enter into the CPAP contract, regardless of whether any other party in the civil proceeding is aware of the existence of or seeks information about the CPAP contract.", "sources": ["https://iga.in.gov/pdf-documents/123/2023/house/bills/HB1124/HB1124.05.ENRS.pdf"], "stale_after": "2027-03-01", "statute_citation": "IC 24-12-4-2", "title": "Indiana \u2014 Third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements by US state \u2014 whether the law requires a party to disclose a litigation funding agreement, to whom, and on what trigger, quoted from the statute itself", "type": "jurisdictional-variation", "verified": false}
{"asset": "litigation-funding-disclosure-requirements-by-state", "body": "**State:** Kansas\n\n**Disclosure obligation:** (a) A party shall provide to the court, for in camera review, any third-party litigation funding agreement within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of a third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later. (b) Except as otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, if a party has entered into a third-party litigation funding agreement, such party shall deliver to all other parties, within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of such third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later, a sworn statement disclosing: (1) The identity of all contracting parties to the third-party litigation funding agreement, including the name, address and, if a party is a legal entity, the place of formation of such entity; (2) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder control or approval rights with respect to litigation or settlement decisions or otherwise has the potential to create conflicts of interest between the third-party funder and the party and, if the agreement does grant such control or approval rights, the nature of the terms and conditions relating to such control or approval rights; (3) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder the right to receive materials designated as confidential pursuant to a protective or confidentiality agreement or order in the action; (4) the existence of any known relationship between a third-party funder and the adverse party, the adverse party's counsel or the court; (5) a description of the nature of the financial interest, including, but not limited to, whether such interest is, in whole or in part, recourse or non-recourse; and (6) whether any foreign person from a foreign country of concern is providing funding, directly or indirectly, for the third-party litigation funding agreement and, if so, the name, address and country of incorporation or registration of the foreign person.\n\n**Disclosed to:** the court, for in camera review (the agreement itself); all other parties (a sworn statement about it)\n\n**When:** within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of a third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later\n\n**Statute:** K.S.A. 60-226\n\n> 60-226. Discovery. (a) Discovery methods.\n\n> (B) (i) Third-party litigation funding agreements. (a) A party shall provide to the court, for in camera review, any third-party litigation funding agreement within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of a third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later. (b) Except as otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, if a party has entered into a third-party litigation funding agreement, such party shall deliver to all other parties, within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of such third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later, a sworn statement disclosing: (1) The identity of all contracting parties to the third-party litigation funding agreement, including the name, address and, if a party is a legal entity, the place of formation of such entity; (2) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder control or approval rights with respect to litigation or settlement decisions or otherwise has the potential to create conflicts of interest between the third-party funder and the party and, if the agreement does grant such control or approval rights, the nature of the terms and conditions relating to such control or approval rights; (3) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder the right to receive materials designated as confidential pursuant to a protective or confidentiality agreement or order in the action; (4) the existence of any known relationship between a third-party funder and the adverse party, the adverse party's counsel or the court; (5) a description of the nature of the financial interest, including, but not limited to, whether such interest is, in whole or in part, recourse or non-recourse; and (6) whether any foreign person from a foreign country of concern is providing funding, directly or indirectly, for the third-party litigation funding agreement and, if so, the name, address and country of incorporation or registration of the foreign person.\n\nSource: <https://www.ksrevisor.gov/statutes/chapters/ch60/060_002_0026.html>\n", "disclosure_requirement": "(a) A party shall provide to the court, for in camera review, any third-party litigation funding agreement within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of a third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later. (b) Except as otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, if a party has entered into a third-party litigation funding agreement, such party shall deliver to all other parties, within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of such third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later, a sworn statement disclosing: (1) The identity of all contracting parties to the third-party litigation funding agreement, including the name, address and, if a party is a legal entity, the place of formation of such entity; (2) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder control or approval rights with respect to litigation or settlement decisions or otherwise has the potential to create conflicts of interest between the third-party funder and the party and, if the agreement does grant such control or approval rights, the nature of the terms and conditions relating to such control or approval rights; (3) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder the right to receive materials designated as confidential pursuant to a protective or confidentiality agreement or order in the action; (4) the existence of any known relationship between a third-party funder and the adverse party, the adverse party's counsel or the court; (5) a description of the nature of the financial interest, including, but not limited to, whether such interest is, in whole or in part, recourse or non-recourse; and (6) whether any foreign person from a foreign country of concern is providing funding, directly or indirectly, for the third-party litigation funding agreement and, if so, the name, address and country of incorporation or registration of the foreign person.", "disclosure_timing": "within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of a third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later", "file": "kansas.md", "generated": true, "harvested": "2026-09-02", "id": "kansas", "jurisdiction": "Kansas", "quote_statute_citation": "60-226. Discovery. (a) Discovery methods.", "recipients": "the court, for in camera review (the agreement itself); all other parties (a sworn statement about it)", "source_quote": "(B) (i) Third-party litigation funding agreements. (a) A party shall provide to the court, for in camera review, any third-party litigation funding agreement within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of a third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later. (b) Except as otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the court, if a party has entered into a third-party litigation funding agreement, such party shall deliver to all other parties, within 30 days after commencement of a legal action or 30 days after execution of such third-party litigation funding agreement, whichever is later, a sworn statement disclosing: (1) The identity of all contracting parties to the third-party litigation funding agreement, including the name, address and, if a party is a legal entity, the place of formation of such entity; (2) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder control or approval rights with respect to litigation or settlement decisions or otherwise has the potential to create conflicts of interest between the third-party funder and the party and, if the agreement does grant such control or approval rights, the nature of the terms and conditions relating to such control or approval rights; (3) whether the agreement grants a third-party funder the right to receive materials designated as confidential pursuant to a protective or confidentiality agreement or order in the action; (4) the existence of any known relationship between a third-party funder and the adverse party, the adverse party's counsel or the court; (5) a description of the nature of the financial interest, including, but not limited to, whether such interest is, in whole or in part, recourse or non-recourse; and (6) whether any foreign person from a foreign country of concern is providing funding, directly or indirectly, for the third-party litigation funding agreement and, if so, the name, address and country of incorporation or registration of the foreign person.", "sources": ["https://www.ksrevisor.gov/statutes/chapters/ch60/060_002_0026.html"], "stale_after": "2027-03-01", "statute_citation": "K.S.A. 60-226", "title": "Kansas \u2014 Third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements by US state \u2014 whether the law requires a party to disclose a litigation funding agreement, to whom, and on what trigger, quoted from the statute itself", "type": "jurisdictional-variation", "verified": false}
{"asset": "litigation-funding-disclosure-requirements-by-state", "body": "**State:** Montana\n\n**Disclosure obligation:** Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, a consumer or the consumer's legal representative or a party or a party's legal representative shall, without awaiting a discovery request, disclose and deliver to the following persons the litigation financing contract: (a) each party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action, or to each party's legal representative; (b) the court, agency, or tribunal in which the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action may be pending; and (c) any known person, including an insurer, with a preexisting contractual obligation to indemnify or defend a party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action.\n\n**Disclosed to:** each party, the court, agency, or tribunal where the matter is pending, and any known person including an insurer with a preexisting obligation to indemnify or defend a party\n\n**When:** without awaiting a discovery request\n\n**Statute:** MCA 31-4-108\n\n> 31-4-108. Disclosure and discovery of litigation financing contracts. (1) Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, a consumer or the consumer's legal representative or a party or a party's legal representative shall, without awaiting a discovery request, disclose and deliver to the following persons the litigation financing contract: (a) each party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action, or to each party's legal representative; (b) the court, agency, or tribunal in which the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action may be pending; and (c) any known person, including an insurer, with a preexisting contractual obligation to indemnify or defend a party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action. (2) The disclosure obligation under subsection (1) exists regardless of whether a civil action or an administrative proceeding has commenced. (3) The disclosure obligation under subsection (1) is a continuing obligation, and within 30 days of entering into a litigation financing contract or amending an existing litigation financing contract, the consumer or the consumer's legal representative or a party or a party's legal representative shall disclose and deliver any new or amended litigation financing contracts.\n\nSource: <https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0310/chapter_0040/part_0010/section_0080/0310-0040-0010-0080.html>\n", "disclosure_requirement": "Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, a consumer or the consumer's legal representative or a party or a party's legal representative shall, without awaiting a discovery request, disclose and deliver to the following persons the litigation financing contract: (a) each party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action, or to each party's legal representative; (b) the court, agency, or tribunal in which the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action may be pending; and (c) any known person, including an insurer, with a preexisting contractual obligation to indemnify or defend a party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action.", "disclosure_timing": "without awaiting a discovery request", "file": "montana.md", "generated": true, "harvested": "2026-09-02", "id": "montana", "jurisdiction": "Montana", "recipients": "each party, the court, agency, or tribunal where the matter is pending, and any known person including an insurer with a preexisting obligation to indemnify or defend a party", "source_quote": "31-4-108. Disclosure and discovery of litigation financing contracts. (1) Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, a consumer or the consumer's legal representative or a party or a party's legal representative shall, without awaiting a discovery request, disclose and deliver to the following persons the litigation financing contract: (a) each party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action, or to each party's legal representative; (b) the court, agency, or tribunal in which the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action may be pending; and (c) any known person, including an insurer, with a preexisting contractual obligation to indemnify or defend a party to the civil action, administrative proceeding, claim, or cause of action. (2) The disclosure obligation under subsection (1) exists regardless of whether a civil action or an administrative proceeding has commenced. (3) The disclosure obligation under subsection (1) is a continuing obligation, and within 30 days of entering into a litigation financing contract or amending an existing litigation financing contract, the consumer or the consumer's legal representative or a party or a party's legal representative shall disclose and deliver any new or amended litigation financing contracts.", "sources": ["https://mca.legmt.gov/bills/mca/title_0310/chapter_0040/part_0010/section_0080/0310-0040-0010-0080.html"], "stale_after": "2027-03-01", "statute_citation": "MCA 31-4-108", "title": "Montana \u2014 Third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements by US state \u2014 whether the law requires a party to disclose a litigation funding agreement, to whom, and on what trigger, quoted from the statute itself", "type": "jurisdictional-variation", "verified": false}
{"asset": "litigation-funding-disclosure-requirements-by-state", "body": "**State:** West Virginia\n\n**Disclosure obligation:** Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party or his or her counsel shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any litigation financier, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent in any respect on the outcome of the legal claim.\n\n**Disclosed to:** the other parties\n\n**When:** without awaiting a discovery request\n\n**Statute:** W. Va. Code \u00a746A-6N-6\n\n> \u00a746A-6N-6. Third-party agreements. (a) Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party or his or her counsel shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any litigation financier, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent in any respect on the outcome of the legal claim.\n\nSource: <https://code.wvlegislature.gov/46A-6N-6/>\n", "disclosure_requirement": "Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party or his or her counsel shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any litigation financier, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent in any respect on the outcome of the legal claim.", "disclosure_timing": "without awaiting a discovery request", "file": "west-virginia.md", "generated": true, "harvested": "2026-09-02", "id": "west-virginia", "jurisdiction": "West Virginia", "recipients": "the other parties", "source_quote": "\u00a746A-6N-6. Third-party agreements. (a) Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party or his or her counsel shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any litigation financier, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent in any respect on the outcome of the legal claim.", "sources": ["https://code.wvlegislature.gov/46A-6N-6/"], "stale_after": "2027-03-01", "statute_citation": "W. Va. Code \u00a746A-6N-6", "title": "West Virginia \u2014 Third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements by US state \u2014 whether the law requires a party to disclose a litigation funding agreement, to whom, and on what trigger, quoted from the statute itself", "type": "jurisdictional-variation", "verified": false}
{"asset": "litigation-funding-disclosure-requirements-by-state", "body": "**State:** Wisconsin\n\n**Disclosure obligation:** Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any person, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent on and sourced from any proceeds of the civil action, by settlement, judgment, or otherwise.\n\n**Disclosed to:** the other parties\n\n**When:** without awaiting a discovery request\n\n**Statute:** Wis. Stat. \u00a7 804.01(2)(bg)\n\n> 804.01(2)(bg) (bg) Third party agreements. Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any person, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent on and sourced from any proceeds of the civil action, by settlement, judgment, or otherwise.\n\nSource: <https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/804.01(2)(bg)>\n", "disclosure_requirement": "Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any person, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent on and sourced from any proceeds of the civil action, by settlement, judgment, or otherwise.", "disclosure_timing": "without awaiting a discovery request", "file": "wisconsin.md", "generated": true, "harvested": "2026-09-02", "id": "wisconsin", "jurisdiction": "Wisconsin", "recipients": "the other parties", "source_quote": "804.01(2)(bg) (bg) Third party agreements. Except as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party shall, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties any agreement under which any person, other than an attorney permitted to charge a contingent fee representing a party, has a right to receive compensation that is contingent on and sourced from any proceeds of the civil action, by settlement, judgment, or otherwise.", "sources": ["https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/804.01(2)(bg)"], "stale_after": "2027-03-01", "statute_citation": "Wis. Stat. \u00a7 804.01(2)(bg)", "title": "Wisconsin \u2014 Third-party litigation funding disclosure requirements by US state \u2014 whether the law requires a party to disclose a litigation funding agreement, to whom, and on what trigger, quoted from the statute itself", "type": "jurisdictional-variation", "verified": false}