# United King Foods Private Limited · 99-39 · PAKISTAN — FDA import alert red lists: firms subject to detention without physical examination

For United King Foods Private Limited · 99-39 · PAKISTAN, import alert is 99-39; import alert name is Detention Without Physical Examination of Imported Food Products That Appear to Be Misbranded; country is PAKISTAN; product is SADA BAHAR MIX | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | SADA BAHAR MIX | LACHA RABRI | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | DOODH DULARI | LACHA RABRI | SADA BAHAR MIX | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | DOODH DULARI | SADA BAHAR MIX | LACHA RABRI | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | LACHA RABRI | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | LACHA RABRI | SADA BAHAR MIX | DOODH DULARI; product code is 03 A - - 99 Bread/Rolls/Buns, N.E.C. | 03 G - - 99 Filled Crackers N.E.C. | 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers | 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers | 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 13 A - - 99 Ice Cream, N.E.C. | 13 A - - 99 Ice Cream, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C; date published is 02/27/2025; address is 16-B-St 9/2, 1 D/2, Sector , Karachi, Sindh PAKISTAN, verified against its source on 2026-09-16.

- **Firm:** United King Foods Private Limited _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Import alert:** 99-39
- **Import alert name:** Detention Without Physical Examination of Imported Food Products That Appear to Be Misbranded
- **Country:** PAKISTAN _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Address:** 16-B-St 9/2, 1 D/2, Sector , Karachi, Sindh PAKISTAN _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Date published:** 02/27/2025 _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Product code:** 03 A - - 99 Bread/Rolls/Buns, N.E.C. | 03 G - - 99 Filled Crackers N.E.C. | 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers | 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers | 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. | 13 A - - 99 Ice Cream, N.E.C. | 13 A - - 99 Ice Cream, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. | 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_
- **Product:** SADA BAHAR MIX | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | SADA BAHAR MIX | LACHA RABRI | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | DOODH DULARI | LACHA RABRI | SADA BAHAR MIX | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | DOODH DULARI | SADA BAHAR MIX | LACHA RABRI | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | LACHA RABRI | Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar | LACHA RABRI | SADA BAHAR MIX | DOODH DULARI _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_
- **FDA notes:** The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the lael contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. | The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_

## What the source says

> United King Foods Private Limited Date Published : 02/27/2025 16-B-St 9/2, 1 D/2, Sector , Karachi, Sindh PAKISTAN 03 A - - 99 Bread/Rolls/Buns, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: SADA BAHAR MIX Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. 03 G - - 99 Filled Crackers N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: SADA BAHAR MIX Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: LACHA RABRI Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the lael contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 H - - 08 Butter/Butter Flavored,Plain Cookies,Biscuits and Wafers Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: DOODH DULARI Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: LACHA RABRI Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 R - - 99 Sweet Goods Without Custard or Cream Filling, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: SADA BAHAR MIX Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: DOODH DULARI Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: SADA BAHAR MIX Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. 03 Y - - 99 Other Bakery Products, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: LACHA RABRI Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 13 A - - 99 Ice Cream, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 13 A - - 99 Ice Cream, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: LACHA RABRI Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: Gajar Halwa/ Halwa Gajar Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the product label is false and misleading. Specifically, the product is labeled with an allergen advisory statement, in part, “Allergy Advise” which states that the product may contain traces of nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act because the labels fail to declare the common or usual name of the nuts. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: LACHA RABRI Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. - in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the product bears or contains a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact. 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. Date Published: 02/27/2025 Desc: SADA BAHAR MIX Notes: The articles are subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3); -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(a)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(a)(1)] in that the allergen advisory statement appears to be misleading because it states “This product may contain traces of nuts, as it has been made in a facility that uses nut ingredients”; however, according to statements (“Pack of nuts inside for garnishing”) and images on the PDPs, the products contain nuts as ingredients. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because the label contains information in multiple foreign languages; therefore, all required information must be in all foreign languages and English. - in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. -in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. 37 B - - 99 Multiple Food Specialities, Side Dishes and Desserts, N.E.C. Date Published: 07/09/2025 Desc: DOODH DULARI Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that the nutrition facts information is not displayed as defined in 21 CFR 101.9. For example, the articles bear two different types of nutrition information panels on the labels. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because they contain information in multiple foreign languages. The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to section 801(a)(3) in that they appear to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(k) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(k)], because the articles bear or contain a chemical preservative but does not bear labeling stating that fact.

## Source

- https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_1144.html

Last verified: 2026-09-16. Review by: 2026-11-15.
Part of [FDA import alert red lists: firms subject to detention without physical examination](https://referencesource.org/fda-import-alert-red-list/).