# BARQUILLOS Y DULCES DELIZ · 99-39 · MEXICO — FDA import alert red lists: firms subject to detention without physical examination

For BARQUILLOS Y DULCES DELIZ · 99-39 · MEXICO, import alert is 99-39; import alert name is Detention Without Physical Examination of Imported Food Products That Appear to Be Misbranded; country is MEXICO; product is Marshmallows | Marshmallows | Marshmallows; product code is 33 J - - 09 Marshmallow Candy, Soft, with Fruit (without Chocolate) | 33 L - - 09 Marshmallow Candy, Soft, without Nuts and Fruit (without Chocolate) | 33 T - - 99 Toppings without Fruit, Nuts or Chocolate N.E.C; date published is 10/02/2015; address is Calle Emilio Madero 7 , Colonia Santa Martha Acatitla Sur , Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico MEXICO, verified against its source on 2026-09-16.

- **Firm:** BARQUILLOS Y DULCES DELIZ _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Import alert:** 99-39
- **Import alert name:** Detention Without Physical Examination of Imported Food Products That Appear to Be Misbranded
- **Country:** MEXICO _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Address:** Calle Emilio Madero 7 , Colonia Santa Martha Acatitla Sur , Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico MEXICO _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Date published:** 10/02/2015 _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Product code:** 33 J - - 09 Marshmallow Candy, Soft, with Fruit (without Chocolate) | 33 L - - 09 Marshmallow Candy, Soft, without Nuts and Fruit (without Chocolate) | 33 T - - 99 Toppings without Fruit, Nuts or Chocolate N.E.C. _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_
- **Product:** Marshmallows | Marshmallows | Marshmallows _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_
- **FDA notes:** VIOLATION; The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(r)(1)(A) because the Principle Display Panel (PDP) and ingredients statement appear to bear nutrient content claims. Specifically the PDP declares ?adicionado con vitamina A; fibra? which means ?added with vitamins and fiber? and ?added with vitamin A; fiber? respectively. The term ?added? when used to describe the level of a nutrient is a nutrient content claim synonymous for ?more?. The regulation that defines ?more? [21 CFR 101.54(e)] requires that the food contain at least 10 percent or more of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) for vitamins or minerals or of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein; dietary fiber; or potassium per reference amount customarily consumed than an appropriate reference food. The product?s nutrition label fails to declare any vitamins or dietary fiber in order to determine if the product meets the claim. Therefore; the product fails to meet the conditions of the nutrient content claims and appears to be misbrand the product within the meaning of 403(r)(1)(A). | VIOLATION; The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(r)(1)(A) because the Principle Display Panel (PDP) and ingredients statement appear to bear nutrient content claims. Specifically the PDP declares ?adicionado con vitamina A; fibra? which means ?added with vitamins and fiber? and ?added with vitamin A; fiber? respectively. The term ?added? when used to describe the level of a nutrient is a nutrient content claim synonymous for ?more?. The regulation that defines ?more? [21 CFR 101.54(e)] requires that the food contain at least 10 percent or more of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) for vitamins or minerals or of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein; dietary fiber; or potassium per reference amount customarily consumed than an appropriate reference food. The product?s nutrition label fails to declare any vitamins or dietary fiber in order to determine if the product meets the claim. Therefore; the product fails to meet the conditions of the nutrient content claims and appears to be misbrand the product within the meaning of 403(r)(1)(A). | VIOLATION; The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(r)(1)(A) because the Principle Display Panel (PDP) and ingredients statement appear to bear nutrient content claims. Specifically the PDP declares ?adicionado con vitamina A; fibra? which means ?added with vitamins and fiber? and ?added with vitamin A; fiber? respectively. The term ?added? when used to describe the level of a nutrient is a nutrient content claim synonymous for ?more?. The regulation that defines ?more? [21 CFR 101.54(e)] requires that the food contain at least 10 percent or more of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) for vitamins or minerals or of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein; dietary fiber; or potassium per reference amount customarily consumed than an appropriate reference food. The product?s nutrition label fails to declare any vitamins or dietary fiber in order to determine if the product meets the claim. Therefore; the product fails to meet the conditions of the nutrient content claims and appears to be misbrand the product within the meaning of 403(r)(1)(A). _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_

## What the source says

> BARQUILLOS Y DULCES DELIZ Date Published : 10/02/2015 Calle Emilio Madero 7 , Colonia Santa Martha Acatitla Sur , Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico MEXICO 33 J - - 09 Marshmallow Candy, Soft, with Fruit (without Chocolate) Date Published: 10/02/2015 Desc: Marshmallows Notes: VIOLATION; The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(r)(1)(A) because the Principle Display Panel (PDP) and ingredients statement appear to bear nutrient content claims. Specifically the PDP declares ?adicionado con vitamina A; fibra? which means ?added with vitamins and fiber? and ?added with vitamin A; fiber? respectively. The term ?added? when used to describe the level of a nutrient is a nutrient content claim synonymous for ?more?. The regulation that defines ?more? [21 CFR 101.54(e)] requires that the food contain at least 10 percent or more of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) for vitamins or minerals or of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein; dietary fiber; or potassium per reference amount customarily consumed than an appropriate reference food. The product?s nutrition label fails to declare any vitamins or dietary fiber in order to determine if the product meets the claim. Therefore; the product fails to meet the conditions of the nutrient content claims and appears to be misbrand the product within the meaning of 403(r)(1)(A). 33 L - - 09 Marshmallow Candy, Soft, without Nuts and Fruit (without Chocolate) Date Published: 10/02/2015 Desc: Marshmallows Notes: VIOLATION; The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(r)(1)(A) because the Principle Display Panel (PDP) and ingredients statement appear to bear nutrient content claims. Specifically the PDP declares ?adicionado con vitamina A; fibra? which means ?added with vitamins and fiber? and ?added with vitamin A; fiber? respectively. The term ?added? when used to describe the level of a nutrient is a nutrient content claim synonymous for ?more?. The regulation that defines ?more? [21 CFR 101.54(e)] requires that the food contain at least 10 percent or more of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) for vitamins or minerals or of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein; dietary fiber; or potassium per reference amount customarily consumed than an appropriate reference food. The product?s nutrition label fails to declare any vitamins or dietary fiber in order to determine if the product meets the claim. Therefore; the product fails to meet the conditions of the nutrient content claims and appears to be misbrand the product within the meaning of 403(r)(1)(A). 33 T - - 99 Toppings without Fruit, Nuts or Chocolate N.E.C. Date Published: 10/02/2015 Desc: Marshmallows Notes: VIOLATION; The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of Section 403(r)(1)(A) because the Principle Display Panel (PDP) and ingredients statement appear to bear nutrient content claims. Specifically the PDP declares ?adicionado con vitamina A; fibra? which means ?added with vitamins and fiber? and ?added with vitamin A; fiber? respectively. The term ?added? when used to describe the level of a nutrient is a nutrient content claim synonymous for ?more?. The regulation that defines ?more? [21 CFR 101.54(e)] requires that the food contain at least 10 percent or more of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) for vitamins or minerals or of the Daily Reference Value (DRV) for protein; dietary fiber; or potassium per reference amount customarily consumed than an appropriate reference food. The product?s nutrition label fails to declare any vitamins or dietary fiber in order to determine if the product meets the claim. Therefore; the product fails to meet the conditions of the nutrient content claims and appears to be misbrand the product within the meaning of 403(r)(1)(A).

## Source

- https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_1144.html

Last verified: 2026-09-16. Review by: 2026-11-15.
Part of [FDA import alert red lists: firms subject to detention without physical examination](https://referencesource.org/fda-import-alert-red-list/).