# EYERUSALEM BALTINA EXPORTER · 99-39 · ETHIOPIA — FDA import alert red lists: firms subject to detention without physical examination

For EYERUSALEM BALTINA EXPORTER · 99-39 · ETHIOPIA, import alert is 99-39; import alert name is Detention Without Physical Examination of Imported Food Products That Appear to Be Misbranded; country is ETHIOPIA; product is Roasted Barley | Roasted Barley; product code is 02 A - - 02 Barley, Whole Grain | 02 G - - 99 Flours and Meals N.E.C; date published is 05/23/2023; address is Misrak Sub-City Misraksub-City , Awashi, ETHIOPIA, verified against its source on 2026-09-16.

- **Firm:** EYERUSALEM BALTINA EXPORTER _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Import alert:** 99-39
- **Import alert name:** Detention Without Physical Examination of Imported Food Products That Appear to Be Misbranded
- **Country:** ETHIOPIA _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Address:** Misrak Sub-City Misraksub-City , Awashi, ETHIOPIA _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Date published:** 05/23/2023 _(verified: appears in the quote below)_
- **Product code:** 02 A - - 02 Barley, Whole Grain | 02 G - - 99 Flours and Meals N.E.C. _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_
- **Product:** Roasted Barley | Roasted Barley _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_
- **FDA notes:** The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3): In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(e)(1)] in that the product labels fail to include the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, as required by 21 CFR 101.5(a). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(e)(2)] because it fails to bear an accurate statement of the net quantity of contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count as required by 21 CFR 101.7. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because it contains information in a second language; therefore, all required information must be in both languages (i.e., the English language as well as the foreign language). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(i)(1)] in that the product label fail to bear the common or usual name of the food. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that product label lacks a Nutrition Facts label is not as required by 21 CFR 101.9. | The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3): In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(e)(1)] in that the product labels fail to include the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, as required by 21 CFR 101.5(a). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(e)(2)] because it fails to bear an accurate statement of the net quantity of contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count as required by 21 CFR 101.7. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because it contains information in a second language; therefore, all required information must be in both languages (i.e., the English language as well as the foreign language). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(i)(1)] in that the product label fail to bear the common or usual name of the food. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that product label lacks a Nutrition Facts label is not as required by 21 CFR 101.9. _(verified: each item appears in the quote below)_

## What the source says

> EYERUSALEM BALTINA EXPORTER Date Published : 05/23/2023 Misrak Sub-City Misraksub-City , Awashi, ETHIOPIA 02 A - - 02 Barley, Whole Grain Date Published: 05/23/2023 Desc: Roasted Barley Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3): In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(e)(1)] in that the product labels fail to include the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, as required by 21 CFR 101.5(a). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(e)(2)] because it fails to bear an accurate statement of the net quantity of contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count as required by 21 CFR 101.7. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because it contains information in a second language; therefore, all required information must be in both languages (i.e., the English language as well as the foreign language). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(i)(1)] in that the product label fail to bear the common or usual name of the food. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that product label lacks a Nutrition Facts label is not as required by 21 CFR 101.9. 02 G - - 99 Flours and Meals N.E.C. Date Published: 05/23/2023 Desc: Roasted Barley Notes: The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801(a)(3): In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(e)(1)] in that the product labels fail to include the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, as required by 21 CFR 101.5(a). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(e)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(e)(2)] because it fails to bear an accurate statement of the net quantity of contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count as required by 21 CFR 101.7. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(f)] because it contains information in a second language; therefore, all required information must be in both languages (i.e., the English language as well as the foreign language). In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. §343(i)(1)] in that the product label fail to bear the common or usual name of the food. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(i)(2) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(i)(2)] in that the product is fabricated from two or more ingredients and the common or usual name of each ingredient is not declared on the label, as required under 21 CFR 101.4. In that it appears to be misbranded within the meaning of section 403(q) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 343(q)] in that product label lacks a Nutrition Facts label is not as required by 21 CFR 101.9.

## Source

- https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_1144.html

Last verified: 2026-09-16. Review by: 2026-11-15.
Part of [FDA import alert red lists: firms subject to detention without physical examination](https://referencesource.org/fda-import-alert-red-list/).